(BLOOMBERG) – The next designer handbag you buy is less likely to bear a “made in China” label.
Fashion companies, eager to diversify their supply chains, were already expanding into production sites in South-east Asia as alternatives to China. Then the trade war happened.
Now, with tariffs on products such as Chinese handbags set to rise, nations like Cambodia and Vietnam are looking more attractive than ever for consumer-goods makers such as Steven Madden Ltd. and Tapestry Inc.’s Coach.
And while the Trump administration has slapped duties on goods from many of its largest trading partners this year, it’s allowed some Cambodian products to continue duty-free access to the US market.
“The shift has been under way,” said Steve Lamar, executive vice president of American Apparel & Footwear Association. The talk of tariffs has created “a lot of anxiety” and companies are gauging how fast they can make more changes to their sourcing, he said.
A study released in July by the US Fashion Industry Association showed that, while all of the companies participating in the survey sourced goods from China, 67 per cent expected to decrease the value or volume of production in the country over the next two years.
US trade protectionism was listed as the number one challenge for the industry.
Steven Madden Chief Executive Officer Edward Rosenfeld said on the company’s most recent earnings call that it has been shifting production of its handbags to Cambodia from China. The maker of shoes and accessories sees 15 per cent of its handbags coming from Cambodia this year, with this percentage doubling in 2019.
“That gives us frankly about a three-year head start on most of our peers, because many folks are just now trying to make that move,” Rosenfeld said on the July 31 conference call.
“Our head of handbag sourcing is actually over there right now, working on a plan to ramp that up.”
Tapestry, the luxury company behind Coach and Kate Spade handbags, has adopted a similar strategy, boosting its Vietnamese production and leaving less than 5 per cent of its sourcing from China.
Vera Bradley, meanwhile, mentioned last December it is looking at sending manufacturing operations to Cambodia and Vietnam from China.
“Cambodia does offer pretty good investment incentives like tax holidays,” said Matt van Roosmalen, country manager for Cambodia at Emerging Markets Consulting, an investment advisory firm focused on South-east Asia.
“As long as the tariff exemptions persist, companies will be more incentivised to invest production capacity in Cambodia.”
The moves to shift production have had an impact in China: Hong Kong-based Stella International Holdings Ltd. – which develops and manufactures footwear for brands like Prada SpA and Guess? Inc. – has seen its stock drop to its lowest point since 2009 as China and the US ratchet up the trade rhetoric.
Cambodia footwear exports rose 25 per cent in 2017, while garment exports increased 8 per cent in the same period, according to an annual report by the National Bank of Cambodia, which attributed the growth in part to increased demand from the US.
Vietnam, meanwhile, has enjoyed a foreign investor-led economic boom for years, attracting billion-dollar investments from the likes of Samsung Electronics Co. and Intel Corp. It is transforming from mainly an exporter of agricultural commodities, such as rice and coffee, to a Southeast Asian manufacturing hub.
“The country enjoys relatively low inflation, a stable currency, and political stability – all of which helps to attract foreign investment,” said Adam Sitkoff, executive director of the American Chamber of Commerce in Hanoi.
“The opportunities are clear – Vietnam is a country of 95 million people traveling pretty quickly on the path from bicycles to motorbikes to BMWs.”
Even before China and the US escalated trade tensions, Cambodia enjoyed duty-free privileges for products such as handbags, suitcases and wallets, part of a US programme to help boost development in low-income countries. This designation has so far been maintained by the Trump administration.
In addition to the tariff threat, wages have risen steadily in China, while Cambodia remains one of the lowest-cost countries when it comes to labour. According to estimates provided by Oxford Economics, labour cost in Cambodia is a quarter of China’s.
Lamar, of the American Apparel & Footwear Association, does recommend caution, however.
“The reality, unfortunately, is that shifting out of China is not easy,” he said.
One reason is that cheap labour does not necessarily equal effective production.
Cambodia’s productivity rates are low compared to China, making it a challenge to manufacture more elaborate products. In a survey by the Hong Kong Development Council, which promotes trade and investment for the territory, factory managers suggested that the average labour productivity of Cambodian workers was about 50 to 60 per cent that of Chinese workers.
Another reason is that Cambodia’s infrastructure is well behind China’s. The nation’s infrastructure ranked 106 out of 137, behind neighbors Vietnam and Laos, in the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report.
This can cause difficulties in getting merchandise out of the country, Lamar said.
Then there’s politics.
The US government recently said that Cambodian elections in July, in which the ruling party won all 125 seats in the National Assembly, were “flawed.”
As a result, the US and Europe could review their trade policies and “potentially stop giving tariff preference to Cambodia’s garment industry,” said Tommy Wu, senior economist at Oxford Economics. Such a move would be a blow for the nation, where garments make up 64 per cent of total exports.
“Setting more output in Cambodia should be taken with caution until the political dust settles,” said Sophal Ear, associate professor of diplomacy and world affairs at Occidental College in Los Angeles.